The Mandalorian and Grogu – This is not the Way
About halfway through watching The Mandalorian and Grogu I realised that I had no idea what this movie was about. Mando (Pedro Pascal), our titular Mandalorian, was on some typical Star Wars Outer Rim world with seedy bars and flickering neon lights, dealing with the local crime boss / ex-Imperial warlord. At no point had the movie established why I should care about this particular warlord or this particular mission. Fine, the Empire is evil and we all enjoy some gratuitous violence against stormtroopers, but by this time I’m about an hour in and it is not clear what the stakes of this movie are. From its auspicious beginning in 2019 with the first season of the TV series, The Mandalorian has now met the fate that befalls all Star Wars intellectual property, namely to have it squeezed of all value until what remains is some by the numbers, unimaginative fanservice. Where did Mando lose his way?
The appeal of The Mandalorian’s first season lay not only in the cuddly cuteness of baby-Yoda Grogu, but its ability to add something new and fresh to the then slightly stale Star Wars franchise. Its Western-inspired style and atmosphere, a main character without Jedi powers, and the smaller settings and personal stakes made it a welcome change from the epic but incoherent narrative of Disney’s cinematic reboot. Despite hiding behind his mask, Mando was much more relatable than your average Jedi, because he was human, fallible and forced to navigate a morally ambiguous world. Set after the fall of the Galactic Empire, The Mandalorian added depth to the familiar Star Wars story. Complicating the self-congratulatory happy ending of The Return of the Jedi, it shows its audience how the post-Imperial world is full of petty warlords, failing social systems and anarchy on the worlds not protected by the fledgling New Republic. Add to that Mando’s personal and moral dilemmas as he is forced to grapple with his unexpected responsibility for the young Grogu and it is not difficult to see why The Mandalorian made for entertaining television.
What is so baffling about The Mandalorian and Grogu is that jettisoned practically all those elements that powered the success of the TV series. After entering into the service of the New Republic and deciding to take on Grogu as his apprentice at the end of season 3, there are no psychological or moral quandaries left for our protagonists to contend with, removing one possible source of good storytelling. Mando’s history and honour code are now also familiar to the audience, so they don’t add the same burst of novelty as before. The original Western-inspired setting has been replaced by some cookie-cutter, computer-generated planets that have no evocative atmosphere or aesthetic to speak of, beyond feeling like budget Bladerunner. And finally, stuff just happens without much of a plot to hold it together.
There is the semblance of a plot, of course. Mando has to save Rotta the Hutt, son of deceased crime-lord Jabba the Hutt, from some godforsaken moon and return him to his aunt and uncle who now run the Hutt crime syndicate. In exchange for the safe return of their nephew, who the Hutts clearly care about as much as the Empire cared about health & safety, they will lead the New Republic to one of the most elusive ex-Imperial warlords they are after. A weak attempt to make the secondment to a pair of criminals into an interesting moral dilemma lasts for about thirty seconds before the movie just moves on. If all this sounds rather convoluted, that is because it is. And if it sounds like the plotline for, at best, a two-episode arc in a TV series, that is because it is.
The predicament of The Mandalorian and Grogu is neatly summarised in an observation from this excellent essay on the difficulties of writing new stories within the Star Wars universe, or any franchise where authors are forbidden from adding or changing key events in the foundational lore:
The challenge placed before the author, in essence, is to tell an engaging story that doesn’t matter and doesn’t change anything about the characters or the world they live in.
As the author of that essay points out, there are ways around this problem depending on the medium. You can shift the focus form the grand epic narrative to the personal stories and sacrifices of the people living in your imaginary world. You can tell stories that add depth to the worldbuilding by exploring histories, cultures, characters or concepts that the key works in a franchise barely have time for. That is what The Mandalorian and Andor did so successfully: while not able to alter Star Wars’ grand narrative, they added not just depth and complexity to the timeline between the movies, but also a sense of realism that the trilogies, with their primary colour approach to good and evil, tended to lack.
If all that fails though, a movie can always fall back on bombastic cinematics, fast-paced action, or spectacular violence to mask the absence of a solid story. This path of least resistance is what The Mandalorian and Grogu has taken, and even that without much commitment or panache. Saddled with a plot that was likely salvaged from the cancelled fourth season and fully lacking in the character development department, The Mandalorian and Grogu instead relies on a series of fully predictable but modest set-piece battles, buttressed by a veritable parade of Star Wars cameos that have to make up for the consistently atrocious dialogue. What is supposed to be the grand finale involves a tedious melee between three bloated CGI sandworms, the incineration of some utterly expendable leftover droids from the Clone Wars series and some ridiculously implausible X-wing pilot banter that’s there purely for the fanservice.
The Mandalorian and Grogu is an ignominious instalment in the iconic story that started in 2019. For all that the movie manages the impressive feat of being convoluted, incoherent and predictable at the same time, it does not even possess the redeeming quality of being entertainingly bad. Instead, it is of the type of forgettable blandness that comes from being designed by committee to such a degree that all risk or creativity have been expunged. The purpose of the thing is what it does, of course, so presumably it is still achieving its objective of maintaining Disney+ subscriptions and Star Wars merchandise sales.
It appears that there are plans for a second movie, which will serve as a grand finale to tie several strands of the Star Wars franchise together, including Ahsoka and The Mandalorian. Based on past experience, I’m not hopeful that something exciting will emerge from combining multiple mediocre ingredients, but we can always hope that like Mando in season 2, The Mandalorian somehow manages to redeem itself.
Notes & Suggestions
- Coming right up to the beginning of the original trilogy and the Rogue One sequel, Andor is arguably even more constrained by the existing canon. Despite this, it tells a much more intriguing story and manages its conclusion as well as can be expected of a story where we know the ending in advance. It’s almost as if interesting characters having to make morally ambiguous choices under pressure make for better television than a parade of cuddly toys.
- I’m not the greatest fan of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, but Marvel’s Thunderbolts demonstrated that it is possible to do something interesting with a fatigued franchise, precisely by focusing on the human element instead of merchandise opportunities.
___
If you enjoyed this blog, you can subscribe
You can also Discuss... this on Remark.As if you have a Write.As account.
And you can follow me on Mastodon: https://writing.exchange/@thecasualcritic